Saturday evening I went to the Capital Grille for dinner. They have great bread and a chowder that is pretty robust as well. Unfortunately the company that was at the bar was not the caliber I am use to keeping.
A recent graduate from a college somewhere in California(Berkley I think she said) whose behavior indicated that she had a tendency to bloviate ad nauseam, about subjects she had amateurish knowledge about, sat one person over from myself. Being the social person and after an initial seemingly friendly greeting, I mentioned how I developed a habit of choosing restaurants based on how good the bread is-- and stated that she didn't know what she was missing.
The California girl whom I can't quite consider a lady, challenged me as to whether I actually selected restaurants in the manner I mentioned. Did she think I was lying? It is important note that I have been selecting restaurants this way for years and that I catalog them so I don't have to think about them; but she insisted that I recall several restaurants. I mentioned one in Cambridge. Unsatisfied she thought she might take a stab at humiliating me- but really making a fool of herself.
She challenged me on whether I had ever been to California; I said I had. In a immature tone she said where; I replied Yosemite. Unsatisfied and full of spite( probably remnants from an inadequate childhood up bring); her retort was "Californians do not consider Yosemite a part of California." Really! I said in amazement. Now at this point I should have dismissed her all together, but I was far too curious about the extent of her ignorance- and how far it could take her. Though I might have looked silly responding to her questions but the badgering continued- so I baited her and played the role.
It is virtually impossible to carry on a meaningful conversation with a California girl who has a level of intellect that demonstrates the need for academic reform in order to remain competitive in the free market system; and who holds the belief that Yosemite National Park (one of the most acclaimed national parks in the world, is not a part of California (and meant it in her conviction)- but i did. And she continued to enervate the conversation- this was going to make for an interesting article. I could not resist finding out how far this charlatan would allow her self to go.
In the end; she is likely to have very little impact in the world because with that apoplectic type attitude and statements nothing more than balderdash- people would see right through her. With lesser debate skills than that of Sarah Palin(but similar understanding of key landmarks, possibly publications) she will amount to little more than a widget in anything she sets out to do.
This experience was a solid reminder to myself, why it is so important to spend time with people and in places that are good for the soul. Funny thing is she probably thinks she really achieved something. I'll have to thank her for the entertainment.
No comments:
Post a Comment